Computer Based Recitation Program Development With Feed Back in Newton’s Law Topic

Rahma Auna Hidayati; Muhammad Reyza Arief Taqwa

doi:10.57092/ijetz.v2i1.49

Authors

Rahma Auna Hidayati Universitas Negeri malang
Muhammad Reyza Arief Taqwa Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i1.49

Keywords:

Development, Newton's Laws, Recitation Program

Abstract

This research was conducted to develop a recitation program on Newton's law and to test its practicality. This type of research is Research and Development (R&D) with a Four-D (4D) model with stages, namely Define (defining), Design (design), Develop (development), and Dissemenate (dissemination). The research subjects were 38 third semester physics students at the State University of Malang. Data collection techniques were carried out by means of media validity test questionnaires and content validity tests given to 2 validator lecturers, as well as practicality test questionnaires and perception questionnaires on the use of each item given to students. The data generated is the percentage of the assessment of the validity test, practicality test, and student perception questionnaires, as well as suggestions given by lecturers and students related to the recitation program. This research resulted in a recitation program in which there were 38 questions accompanied by feedback. The results of the content validity test obtained a value of 95.7%, while the results of the media validity test obtained a value of 93.75% so that it was included in the very valid category. Then, the results of the practicality questionnaire show that students agree that the recitation program can make it easier to understand Newton's law concepts, help strengthen their understanding of Newton's law concepts, and this program is interesting for them. Meanwhile, based on the results of the student perception test regarding the use of items, the average score was 96.6%, which means that the questions, feedback, and discussion videos in the recitation program are very easy to understand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahman, A., Saregar, A., & Umam, R. (2018). The effect of feedback as soft scaffolding on ongoing assessment toward the quantum physics concept mastery of the prospective physics teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.7239

Adila, A. S. D., Sutopo, & Wartono. (2019). Recitation program to improve students’ conceptual understanding of Thermodynamics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012069

Arbel, Y., Hong, L., Baker, T. E., & Holroyd, C. B. (2017). It’s all about timing: An electrophysiological examination of feedback-based learning with immediate and delayed feedback. Neuropsychologia, 99(September 2016), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.003

Arista, F. S., & Kuswanto, H. (2018). Virtual physics laboratory application based on the android smartphone to improve learning independence and conceptual understanding. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1111a

Atasoy, S., Kucuk, M., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2011). Remedying science student teachers’ misconceptions of force and motion using worksheets based on constructivist learning theory. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 3(4), 653–668.

Attali, Y., & van der Kleij, F. (2017). Effects of feedback elaboration and feedback timing during computer-based practice in mathematics problem solving. Computers and Education, 110, 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.012

Cann, A. J. (2007). Podcasting is Dead. Long Live Video! Bioscience Education, 10(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.10.c1

Chen, X., Breslow, L., & DeBoer, J. (2018). Analyzing productive learning behaviors for students using immediate corrective feedback in a blended learning environment. Computers and Education, 117(September 2017), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.013

De Almeida, M. J., Martins, D. R., Sá, M. V., Pires, A. J., & Tremoco, J. J. (2019). Student centered teaching activities in secondary schools and misconceptions evolution: Basic mechanics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1287(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1287/1/012015

Diyana, T. N., Sutopo, & Sunaryono. (2020). The effectiveness of web-based recitation program on improving students’ conceptual understanding in fluid mechanics. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.24043

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–148. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119

Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020106

Erfan, M., & Ratu, T. (2018). Analysis of Student Difficulties in Understanding the Concept of Newton’s Law of Motion. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 1–4.

Gumilar, S. (2016). Analisis Miskonsepsi Konsep Gaya Menggunakan Certainty of Respon Index (CRI). Gravity, 2(1), 59–71.

Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S52–S59. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19520

Handhika, J., Cari, C., Soeparmi, A., & Sunarno, W. (2016). Student conception and perception of Newton’s law. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1708(February). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941178

Heinze, A & Reiss, K. (2016). Developing Argumentation and Proof Competencies in the Mathematics Classroom, In:Teaching and Learning Proof Across The Grades: A K-16 Perspective. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16), 38–41.

Jayanti, I. B. R., Wartono, & Sutopo. (2016). Dampak Program Resitasi Terhadap Perubahan Konseptual Mahasiswa pada Topik Hukum III Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 256–264.

Jug, R., Jiang, X. S., & Bean, S. M. (2019). Giving and receiving effective feedback a review article and how-to guide. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 143(2), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0058-RA

Kaniawati, I., Fratiwi, N. J., Danawan, A., Suyana, I., Samsudin, A., & Suhendi, E. (2019). Analyzing students’ misconceptions about Newton’s Laws through Four-Tier Newtonian Test (FTNT). Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10269a

Kartiko, D. C., & Habibulloh, M. (2018). Revealing physical education students’ misconception in sport biomechanics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006(1), 218–222. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012040

Kryjevskaia, M. (2019). Examining the relationships among intuition, reasoning, and conceptual understanding in physics. Upgrading Physics Education to Meet the Needs of Society, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96163-7_12

Kustusch, M. B. (2016). Assessing the impact of representational and contextual problem features on student use of right-hand rules. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010102

Liu, G., & Fang, N. (2016). Student Misconceptions about Force and Acceleration in Physics and Engineering Mechanics Education Article in. In International Journal of Engineering Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295010239

McCarthy, J. (2015). Evaluating Written, Audio and Video Feedback in Higher Education Summative Assessment Tasks. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 153–169.

Minarni, Kurniawan, Y., & Muliyani, R. (2017). Identifikasi Kuantitas Siswa yang Miskonsepsi pada Materi Listrik Dinamis Menggunakan Three Tier-Test (TTT). Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, 2(1), 1–3.

Nicol, D., & MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and selfregulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Otero, V., Pollock, S., & Finkelstein, N. (2010). A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model. American Journal of Physics, 78(11), 1218–1224. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3471291

Pebriana, I. N., Sutopo, & Diantoro, M. (2018). Dampak Program Resitasi terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa pada Topik Fluida Dinamis. Jurnal Pendidikan : Teori Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 3(8), 1110–1114.

Pratiwi, Y., Sitompul, S. S., & Mursyid, S. (2016). Penggunaan Metode Eksperimen Berbantuan Video Feedback untuk Meremediasi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Pembiasan Cahaya. 2013, 1–9.

Riduwan. (2013). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. ALFABETA.

Sasmita, F. D., Arifuddin, M., & Mahtari, S. (2020). The Effect of Diboracy (Digital Book Containing Scientific Literacy) in Reducing Misconceptions on Newton’s Law of Gravity. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 8(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v8i2.3164

Sellami, N., Shaked, S., Laski, F. A., Eagan, K. M., & Sanders, E. R. (2017). Implementation of a learning assistant program improves student performance on higher-order assessments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0341

Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2014). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics Ninth Edition. Boston: Brooks/COLE Cengage Learning.

Shishigu, A., Hailu, A., & Anibo, Z. (2018). Problem-based learning and conceptual understanding of college female students in physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78035

Stoen, S. M., McDaniel, M. A., Frey, R. F., Hynes, K. M., & Cahill, M. J. (2020). Force concept inventory: More than just conceptual understanding. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 10105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010105

Suraya, S. N. (2016). Peran Asisten Guru (Teaching Assistants) Dalam Maksimalisasi Proses Pembelajaran Di Kelas. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 3(01), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v3i01.63

Sutopo, Jayanti, I. B. R., & Wartono. (2016). Efektivitas Program Resitasi Berbasis Komputer Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Mahasiswa Tentang Gaya dan Gerak. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 111–119.

Syuhendri, S. (2019). Student teachers’ misconceptions about gravity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012047

Syuhendri, S., Andriani, N., & Taufiq, T. (2019). Preliminary development of Conceptual Change Texts regarding misconceptions on Basic Laws of Dynamics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1166(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012013

Taqwa, M. R. A., & Faizah, R. (2016). Perlunya Program Resitasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Mahasiswa dalam Memahami Konsep Gaya dan Gerak. Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 12(1), 365–372.