Student Creativity Through Animated Cartoon Images Using Artificial  Intelligence: Does It Affect Indirect Creativity Indicators?

Aminah Zb; Wasim Khan

doi:10.57092/ijetz.v3i2.252

Authors

Aminah Zb Universitas Negeri Malang
Wasim Khan Gomal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v3i2.252

Keywords:

Animated Cartoon Images, Artificial Intelligence, Student Creativity, Indirect Creativity

Abstract

This research aims to see the influence of cartoon animation media on student creativity in nutrition and food courses. This research uses quantitative descriptive methods. This research was carried out at UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, with a research population of 47 students who took nutrition and food courses in semester V. The sample in this study used a total sampling technique, namely, the entire population that was the research subject. The data collection technique uses an indirect creativity questionnaire survey on five indicators using a Likert scale with a total of 20 questions. Based on the research results, data was obtained that the use of Artificial Intelligence-based cartoon media can influence student learning creativity in nutrition and food courses with an average score of 4.46 in the good category, where in detail, each indicator, such as the Investigation Group, has an average score of 4.44 in the good category, the Pre-Knowledge Indicator with an average value of 4.13 in the Good category, then the Influence of Culture and Values indicator with an average value of 4.83 in the good category, the Motivation indicator with an average value of 4.95 in the good category and the Self-Esteem indicator with an average value of 3.87 in the pretty good category. The highest creativity indicator in this research is Motivation in the good category, while the lowest in this research is the Self-Esteem creativity indicator in the quite good category.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akamca, G. Ö., Ellez, A. M., & Hamurcu, H. (2009). Effects of computer aided concept cartoons on learning outcomes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.054

Arikan, A., & Ulas Taraf, H. (2010). Contextualizing young learners ’ English lessons with cartoons : Focus on grammar and vocabulary. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 5212–5215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.848

Bahrudin, A. D., & Yogihati, C. I. (2022). Development of Interactive Learning Media as an Alternative to Improve Students ’ Conceptual Understanding and Motivation on the Temperature and Heat Topics. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 8–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.37

Boulianne, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Young People, Digital Media, and Engagement: A Meta-Analysis of Research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318814190

Canonico, L. B., Mcneese, N. J., & Duncan, C. (2018). Machine Learning as Grounded Theory : Human-Centered Interfaces for Social Network Research through Artificial Intelligence. 1252–1256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621287

Chin, C., & Chia, L. (2004). Work in Biology through Problem-based Learning. Journal of Biological Education, 38(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655904

Commons, C., License, A., Wang, G., & Wei, N. (2023). Retracted : Motion Capture Technology of Digital Animation Art. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2022, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4857250

Cook, M., & Cowan, M. (2023). Useful Animation : Iconography , Infrastructure and Impact. Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18(3), 196–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/17468477231207613

Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00229

Creel, S. C., & Frye, C. I. (2024). Journal of Experimental Child Minimal gains for minimal pairs : Difficulty in learning similar-sounding words continues into preschool. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 240, 105831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105831

Dereli, M. (2010). Does instruction of “ Integers ” subject with cartoons effect students ’ mathematics anxiety ? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2176–2180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.302

Divanji, R. A., Bindman, S., Tung, A., Chen, K., Castaneda, L., & Scanlon, M. (2023). A one stop shop ? Perspectives on the value of adaptive learning technologies in K-12 education. Computers and Education Open, 5(August), 100157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100157

Eagles, P. F. J., & Demare, R. (1999). Factors influencing children’s environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909601882

El-mashad, S. Y., & Hamed, E. S. (2022). Automatic creation of a 3D cartoon from natural language story. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(3), 101641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.11.010

Gökçearslan, A. (2010). The effect of cartoon movies on children's gender development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5202-5207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.846.

Guo, S. (2018). “ Occupying ” the Internet : State media and the reinvention of official culture online. Communication and the Public, 3(I), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047318755166

Hapke, H., Lee-Post, A., & Dean, T. (2020). 3-in-1 Hybrid Learning Environment. Marketing Education Review, 00(00), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2020.1855989

Hayes, D. (2015). Against critical thinking pedagogy. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 14(4), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022215592248

Iftene, A., Iftene, A., & Trandab, D. (2018). Enhancing the of through Augmented the Attractiveness Attractiveness of Learning Learning through Augmented Reality Reality Enhancing the Attractiveness of Learning through Augmented. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.220

Ilin, V. (2022). The role of user preferences in engagement with online learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211035514

Jumaat, N. F., & Tasir, Z. (2013). Integrating Project Based Learning Environment into the Design and Development of Mobile Apps for Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.369

Kagerbauer, M., & Magdolen, M. (2024). Workshop synthesis: Measuring attitudes and perceptions in large scale (quantitative) surveys. Transportation Research Procedia, 76(2022), 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.12.082

Kong, S. (2021). Delivery and evaluation of an e-Learning framework through computer-aided analysis of learners ’ reflection text in a teacher development course. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00172-w

Kozma, R. B. (1991). Review of Educational. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002179

Kritt, D. W. (2018). Constructivist Education in an Age of Accountability (D. W. Kritt (ed.)). Palagrave macmillan.

Leak, A. E., Rothwell, S. L., Olivera, J., Zwickl, B., Vosburg, J., & Martin, K. N. (2017). Examining problem solving in physics-intensive Ph.D. research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020101

Lijanporn, S., & Khlaisang, J. (2015). The development of an activity-based learning model using educational mobile application to enhance discipline of elementary school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1707–1712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.825

Lovat, T. (2023). Gifted education and Islamic educational philosophy : A neat convergence. Gifted Education Internationa, 39(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294221125555

Madakam, S., Uchiya, T., Mark, S., & Lurie, Y. (2022). Artificial Intelligence , Machine Learning and Deep Learning ( Literature : Review and Metrics ). Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 18(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X221136682

Madden, S., & Alt, R. A. (2021). Know Her Name : Open Dialogue on Social Media as a Form of Innovative Justice. Social Media + Society, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984447

Miller, K. A., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2070638

Mohammadi, F., & Heidari, M. (2014). The Effect of Intersemiotic Translation on Vocabulary Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.530

Mou, T. (2023). International Journal of Educational Research Open Science learning with designed animation : Investigation of primary school children ’ s attitudes toward science learning , animation integration , and understanding level. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4(September 2022), 100246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100246

Newhouse, N. (1990). Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental conservation. Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.9943043

Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2(April), 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020

Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., Steingut, R. R., Trimble, S. S., & Pituch, K. A. (2017). Supporting and Thwarting Autonomy in the High School Science Classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 35(4), 337–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1358722

Pe’er, S., Goldman, D., & Yavetz, B. (2007). Environmental literacy in teacher training: Attitudes, knowledge, and environmental behavior off beginning students. Journal of Environmental Education, 39(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.39.1.45-59

Schmidt, H. G. (2012). A Brief History of Problem-based Learning. In One-Day, One-Problem: An Approach to Problem-based Learning (pp. 21–40). Springer Science Business Media Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-75-3

Sezen, G., & B, A. C. (2012). Designing computer assisted problem based learning environment in the subject of endocrine system in human beings for high school biology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.655

Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2021). Stealth assessment of creativity in a physics video game. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106647

Skulmowski, A. (2023). Computers & Education : X Reality Shape distinctness and segmentation bene fi t learning from realistic visualizations , while dimensionality and perspective play a minor role. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2(December 2022), 100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100015

Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, O. (2006). Improving achievement through problem-based learning. Journal of Biological Education, 40(4), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656037

Turan, B. (2014). Smart Board İ n Mathematics Education , The Use Of Cartoon Characters İ mpact On Student Success. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 809–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.481

Vandeleur, S., Ankiewics, P. ., de Swardt, A. ., & Gross, E. . (2006). Indicators of creativity in a technology class : a case study. South African Journal OfEducation, 21(4), 268–273. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/view/24914

Yerushalmi, E., Cohen, E., Heller, K., Heller, P., & Henderson, C. (2010). Instructors’ reasons for choosing problem features in a calculus-based introductory physics course. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020108

Yoon, Y., Kyung, B., Jin, S., Oh, J., & Chae, H. (2017). Analysis of seven animation characters in Pororo the Little Penguin with Sasang typology. Integrative Medicine Research, 6(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2017.02.002

Zb, A., Novalian, D., Rozal, E., Sulman, F., & Habibi, M. (2021). STEM Approach in Online Lectures: How Does it Contribute to Cognitive Aspects? Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 5(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v5i2.4365

Zb, A., Setiawan, M. E., Rozal, E., & Sulman, F. (2021). Investigating Hybrid Learning Strategies: Does it Affect Creativity? Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(4), 868–875. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i4.4063

Zhang, Y., Li, G., & Shan, G. (2022). Visual Informatics Time analysis of regional structure of large-scale particle using an interactive visual system. Visual Informatics, 6(2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2022.03.004

Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2018). ‘Kexue Wenhua’ in Chinese and ‘Scientific Culture’, ‘Science Culture’, ‘Culture of Science’ and ‘Science as Culture’ in English: The Meanings and the Structure. Cultures of Science, 1(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/209660831800100104

Zheng, Y., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Wu, X., Ding, R., Luo, X., Liu, P., & Huang, J. (2024). Effects of digital game-based learning on students ’ digital etiquette literacy , learning motivations , and engagement. Heliyon, 10(1), e23490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23490