Utilization of Test Instruments Using Safe Exam Browser for Scientific Literacy Seen From The Perspective of Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v3i2.256Keywords:
Safe Exam Browser, Scientific Literacy, Student Perspective, Tes IntrumentsAbstract
The research that has been carried out aims to see how students view test instruments that use safe exam browser to measure students' scientific literacy skills on virus material in biology learning. The population of this study was MAN I Kerinci students in class X who had studied virus material in biology lessons. This sampling was used because 20 students felt it was sufficient to create a knowledge picture of their general scientific literacy abilities. The data analysis technique in this research uses a questionnaire with a Likert scale. The analysis will be conducted using the understanding or theory of student response criteria from the questionnaire given. The categorization is divided into 4 categories and also analyzed in the form of percentages and analysis of interviews with several randomly selected students and direct observation. The results of the research show how students view the test instruments given, where the average student gave a score of 86.1%, with an average score of 3.44 in the pretty good category. The pretty good category details that the virus material provided by the teacher from the student's perspective is pretty good on the test instrument used, namely 86.2% with a response criterion of 3.45, including the pretty good category, then the language used also has an average student response value of 86.2% with a response criterion of 3.44 with a response category of pretty good.
Downloads
References
Arif, M. N., Sumbawati, M. S., Buditjahjanto, I. G. P. A., & Rijanto, T. (2021). Analysis of the moodle application instrument with the exam browser to measure online learning outcomes in digital communication simulation subjects. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 3(5), 365–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v3i5.5019
Aulya, N., Karmila, N., & Wulandari, R. (2023). Analysis of Discipline , Effectiveness and Barriers to Online Learning During the Pandemic Reviewed From The Views of Students. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/https://10.57092/ijetz.v2i2.106
Ayua, B., Etta, C., Nkemdilim, M., Ntol, A., Ndifon, A., Obun, M., Emmanuel, I., Etim, E., Eneyo, O., & Oluwatobi, J. (2024). Social Sciences & Humanities Open Electronic media learning technologies and environmental education pedagogy in tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9(October 2023), 100760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100760
Bertrand, M. G., & Namukasa, I. K. (2020). STEAM education: student learning and transferable skills. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-01-2020-0003
Branch, R. M. (209 C.E.). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. In Springer (pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Brears, L., Tutor, S., Macintyre, B., Lecturer, S., Sullivan, G. O., & Lecturer, S. (2011). Preparing Teachers for the 21st Century Using PBL as an Integrating Strategy in Science and Technology Education. Design and Technology Education, 16(1), 36–46. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_14
Carmi, N., Arnon, S., & Orion, N. (2015). Transforming Environmental Knowledge into Behavior: The Mediating Role of Environmental Emotions. Journal of Environmental Education, 46(3), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1028517
Chang, T. Y., Hong, G., Paganelli, C., Phantumvanit, P., Chang, W. J., Shieh, Y. S., & Hsu, M. L. (2020). Innovation of dental education during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Dental Sciences, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.07.011
Chen, L., Yoshimatsu, N., Goda, Y., Okubo, F., Taniguchi, Y., Oi, M., Konomi, S., Shimada, A., Ogata, H., & Yamada, M. (2019). Direction of collaborative problem solving-based STEM learning by learning analytics approach. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0119-y
Chusni, M. M., Saputro, S., Suranto, & Rahardjo, S. B. (2020). The potential of discovery learning models to empower students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1464(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1464/1/012036
Cónsul-giribet, M. (2014). Strengths and weaknesses of Problem Based Learning from the professional perspective of registered nurses 1. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 22(5), 724–730. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3236.2473
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education, Inc.
Cropley, D. H., & Patston, T. J. (2019). Pre-publication version: Cropley, D. H. and Patston, T. (2019). Supporting Creative Teaching and Learning in the Classroom: Myths, Models, and Measures, In C. Mullen (Ed.), Creativity Under Duress in Education? Resistive Theories, Practices, and Actions ,. 15, 267–288.
de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2017). Bridging Cognitive Load and Self-Regulated Learning Research: A complementary approach to contemporary issues in educational research. Learning and Instruction, 51, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.06.001
Harrison, T., & SLaco, D. (2022). Where ’ s the character education in online higher education ? Constructivism , virtue ethics and roles of online educators. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(6), 555–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221104885
Hasanah, U., Dewi, N., & Rosyida, I. (2019). Self-Efficacy Siswa SMP Pada Pembelajaran Model Learning Cycle 7E ( Elicit , Engange , Explore , Explain , Elaborate , Evaluate , and Extend ). Prisma Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 551–555.
Hidayati, R. A., Reyza, M., & Taqwa, A. (2023). Computer Based Recitation Program Development With Feed Back i n Newton ’ s Law Topic. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i1.49
Ibarra-vazquez, G., Ramírez-montoya, M. S., Buenestado-fernández, M., & Olague, G. (2023). Predicting open education competency level : A machine learning approach. Heliyon, 9(11), e20597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20597
Lin, O. (2008). Student Views of Hybrid Learning. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2008.10784610
Madden, S., & Alt, R. A. (2021). Know Her Name : Open Dialogue on Social Media as a Form of Innovative Justice. Social Media + Society, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984447
Malone, K. L. (2008). Correlations among knowledge structures, force concept inventory, and problem-solving behaviors. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.020107
Martin, N. I., Kelly, N., & Terry, P. C. (2018). A framework for self-determination in massive open online courses: Design for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3722
Meeuwisse, M., Gorgievski, M., & Smeets, G. (2023). Uncovering important 21st-century skills for sustainable career development of social sciences graduates : A systematic review Ays. Educational Research Review, 39(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100528
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
Moe, H. (2008). Public Service Media Online ? Regulating Public Broadcasters ’ Internet Services — A Comparative Analysis. Television & New Media, 9(3), 220–238.
Mullet, D. R., Kettler, T., & Sabatini, A. M. (2018). Gifted Students’ Conceptions of Their High School STEM Education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217745156
Murtagh, E. M., Calderón, A., Scanlon, D., & Macphail, A. (2023). Online teaching and learning in physical education teacher education : A mixed studies review of literature. European Physical Education Review, 29(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X231155793
Muwonge, C. M., Ssenyonga, J., Kibedi, H., & Schiefele, U. (2020). Use of self-regulated learning strategies Among Teacher Education students: A latent profile analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100037
Palaloi, N. K., Mar, M., & Syamsiyah, N. (2023). Efektivitas Aplikasi Exam Browser dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran di SMA Muhammadiyah 4 Cawang Pendahuluan Metode. Jurnal Sinestesia, 13(2), 1382–1388. https://sinestesia.pustaka.my.id/journal/article/view/512
Panyahuti, P., & Ganeferi, G. (2023). Safe exam Browser Untuk Android pada Ujian Berbasis Web. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31571/edukasi.v17i2.1454
Puccio, G. J., Murdock, M. C., & Mance, M. (2005). Current developments in creative problem solving for organizations: A focus on thinking skills and styles. In Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving (Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 43–76).
Reyza, M., Taqwa, A., Sulman, F., & Faizah, R. (2022). College Students ’ Conceptual Understanding of Force and Motion : Research Focus on Resource Theory. Journal of Physic: IOP Confrence. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012073
Rosbottom, J. (2001). Hybrid learning - A safe route into web-based open and distance learning for the computer science teacher. Proceedings of the Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/377435.377493
Sari, S. Y., Rahim, F. R., Sundari, P. D., & Aulia, F. (2022). The importance of e-books in improving students’ skills in physics learning in the 21st century: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2309(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012061
Sari, T., & Nayır, F. (2020). Challenges in distance education during the (Covid-19) pandemic period. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(3), 328–360. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2020.5872
Seufert, T. (2018). The interplay between self-regulation in learning and cognitive load. Educational Research Review, 24, 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.004
Shah, S. S., Shah, A. A., Memon, F., Kemal, A. A., & Soomro, A. (2021). Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Applying the self-determination theory in the ‘new normal.’ Revista de Psicodidáctica, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.12.003
Sullivan, T. M., & Freishtat, R. (2013). Extending Learning Beyond the Classroom: Graduate Student Experiences of Online Discussions in a Hybrid Course. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 61(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2013.758555
Torres, A. L. M. O. C. (2011). Understanding and intervening in E-learning in higher education institution. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.178
Tuan Soh, T. M., Arsada, N. M., & Osman, K. (2010). The relationship of 21st century skills on students’ attitude and perception towards physics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.073
Watts, E. H., O’Brian, M., & Wojcik, B. W. (2003). Four Models of Assistive Technology Consideration: How Do They Compare to Recommended Educational Assessment Practices? Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340401900104
Yuliani, A., Dharmono, Naparin, A., & Zaini, M. (2018). Creative Thinking Ability of Biology Education Student’s in Problem Solving of Plant Ecology. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 29–34. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/bioedukasi/article/view/19736
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gina Sulman, Ramadani, Diniyah Rizkiyanti Zebua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.