Analysis of Student Tendencies in the Learning Process: Judging from Cheating Behavior

Authors

  • Rachmat Sholahuddin Febry UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Ardha Yani UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Dini Marliyani UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Yola Armita UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i3.94

Abstract

This study discusses the analysis of cheating behaviour in the world of education. This type of research uses a qualitative descriptive method. The research subjects were SMP Nurul Khoir Jambi students, with a total population of 94 students and a sample of 34 students. The sampling technique used is random. Then, the data collection techniques used were Google Forms, interviews with two questions, and documentation. This study found that the number of students who often cheated was 15 people, the number of students who sometimes cheated was 10 people, and the number of students who rarely cheated was nine people. The results of this study state that for the often cheating category, there are ten students with a percentage of 29.41%; the next category is sometimes cheating, there are 15 students with a percentage of 44.12%, while the rarely cheating category has nine students and with a percentage of 26.47%. The most significant research results are in the sometimes cheating category, while the smallest category is in the rarely cheating category.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andiwatir, Alexius & Khakim Aliyil. (2019). Analisis Perilaku Menyontek dan Rancangan Perubahannya pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Psikologi Ilmiah. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/INTUISI

Hariandi, A. (2020). Implementasi nilai kejujuran akademik peserta didik di lingkungan sekolah dasar. Nur El-Islam: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Keagamaan, 7(1), 52–66.

Hartanto, D. (2012). Bimbingan dan Konseling Menyontek Mengungkapkan Akar Masalah dan Solusinya. Yogyakarta: PT. Indeks.

Hendryadi, Tricahyadinata, & Zannati, R. (2019). Metode Penelitian: Pedoman Penelitian Bisnis dan Akademik. Jakarta: Lembaga Pengembangan Manajemen dan Publikasi Imperium (LPMP Imperium).

Kiki, N & Hadjam, M. (2015). Hubungan Antara Berpikir Positif dan Perilaku Menyontek Pada Siswa Kelas X SMK Koperasi Yogyakarta. Jurnal Fakultas Psikologi, 3(1): 9.

Kurniasih, P., Limbong, E. G., & Handayani, D. (2019). Infografis Alasan Menyontek dan Tipe-Tipe Penyontek: Pandangan Etika Mengenai Perilaku Menyontek. ResearchGate, 112-113.

Kusdiana, et al. (2018). Percaya Diri, Religiusitas dan Perilaku Menyontek. Jurnal Konseling Indonesia. http://ejournal.unikama.ac.id/index.php/JKI

Kushartanti, A. (2009). Perilaku Menyontek ditinjau dari Kepercayaan Diri. Indigenious. Jurnal Imliah Berkala Psikologi. 11(2).

Lusiane, L., & Garvin. (2018). Tekanan orangtua, perfeksionisme, dan ketidakjujuran akademik pada pelajar di Jakarta (Parental pressure, perfectionism, and academical dishonesty among students in Jakarta). Mind Set, 9(1), 60–77.

Moleong, Lexy J. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Cetakan ke-36, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Mujahidah. (2009). Perilaku Menyontek Laki-laki dan Perempuan: Studimeta Anlisis. Jurnal Psikologi, 2(2).

Mukti, P. G. (2015). Hubungan Antara Self Efficacy Dengan Perilaku Menyontek pada Siswa Kelas XI Di SMA Negeri 1 Pleret Bantul Yogyakarta. Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 6(2).

Nada, A. Q., Taqwa, M., Arief, T., Supriana, E., & Suwasono, P. (2022). Development of an Android-Based Physics Interactive E-Module Equipped with Problems with Scaffolding in Applying the Concept of Light Waves. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 8–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.43

Nursalam (2012). Intensitas Copying Answer pada Tes Kemampuan Matematika, Lantera Pendidikan. Vol 15 No. 1.

Nyamwange, C., Ondima, P., & Onderi, P. (2013). Factors Influencing Examination Cheating Among Secondary School Students: A Case of Masaba South District of Kisii County. Elixir Psychology, 56, 13519–13524.

Purwanto, A. (2015). Pengaruh Efikasi Diri terhadap Perilaku Menyontek Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Negeri Se-Gugus II Kecamatan Pakem Kabupaten Sleman Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015. Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Putarek, V., & Pavlin-Bernardic, N. (2019). The Role of Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning, Achievement Goals, and Engagement in Academic Cheating. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00443-7.

Raharjo, P. G. P., & Marwanto, A. (2015). Pengaruh Kepercayaan Diri Dan Konformitas Teman Sebaya Terhadap Perilaku Menyontek Siswa Kelas XI Jurusan Teknik Pengelasan. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasional Teknik Mesin, 3(4), 255–262.

Silaen, D. (2015). Hubungan Religiusitas Dengan Intensi Menyontek Pada Mahasiswa Kristen Protestan Universitas Padjadjaran Jatinangoro. Universitas Padjadjaran.

Stewart, C.J. & Cash W.B. (1982). Interviewing Principles and Practices. 3rd edition. Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company Publisher.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Sulistyaningsih. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kebidanan Kuantitatif-Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Watson, G., & Sottile, J. (2010). Cheating in the digital age: do students cheat more in online courses? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(1)

Downloads

Published

2023-10-08

How to Cite

Febry, R. S., Yani, A. ., Marliyani, D., & Armita, Y. (2023). Analysis of Student Tendencies in the Learning Process: Judging from Cheating Behavior. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i3.94