The  Role and Urgency of Animation Media In The Development of Students' Cognitive Domain

Fitriatul Habibah; Yori Marwinda; Septa Viani; Putri Ramadani

doi:10.57092/ijetz.v3i2.175

Authors

Fitriatul Habibah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
Yori Marwinda UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
Septa Viani UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
Putri Ramadani UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v3i2.175

Keywords:

Animation Media, Learning Outcomes, Role and Urgency, Science Learning

Abstract

The rapid development of technology has changed the goals of implementing the learning process. This research aims to determine the impact of animation media on students' cognitive learning outcomes in science learning. This type of research is descriptive qualitative. The population in the study was 16 students in class V of SD 113 Jambi City. The sample in this study used a total sampling technique, namely all Class V students totaling 16 students. The data collection technique uses test questions, then the test results will be analyzed by researchers to find out how much influence the students' cognitive domain has on the results of using animation media on student learning outcomes in science learning. The research results showed that the impact on students' cognitive domain was good at 62.5%, moderate at 31.25%, and 6.25% in the low category. The data obtained indicates that there is a good influence on learning outcomes in the cognitive domain of students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, L. A. (2017). Enriching Information Technology Course Materials by Using Youtube. August, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/u7mjw

Boulianne, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Young People, Digital Media, and Engagement: A Meta-Analysis of Research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318814190

Brears, L., Tutor, S., Macintyre, B., Lecturer, S., Sullivan, G. O., & Lecturer, S. (2011). Preparing Teachers for the 21st Century Using PBL as an Integrating Strategy in Science and Technology Education. Design and Technology Education, 16(1), 36–46.

Cai, S., Liu, C., Wang, T., Liu, E., & Liang, J. C. (2021). Effects of learning physics using Augmented Reality on students’ self-efficacy and conceptions of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13020

Ceberio, M., Almudí, J. M., & Franco, Á. (2016). Design and Application of Interactive Simulations in Problem-Solving in University-Level Physics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9615-7

Cremers, P. H. M., Wals, A. E. J., Wesselink, R., Nieveen, N., & Mulder, M. (2014). Self-directed lifelong learning in hybrid learning configurations. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 33(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2013.838704

Dajani, D., & Abu Hegleh, A. S. (2019). Behavior intention of animation usage among university students. Heliyon, 5(10), e02536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02536

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Divanji, R. A., Bindman, S., Tung, A., Chen, K., Castaneda, L., & Scanlon, M. (2023). A one stop shop ? Perspectives on the value of adaptive learning technologies in K-12 education. Computers and Education Open, 5(August), 100157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100157

Fralinger, B., & Owens, R. (2009). You Tube As A Learning Tool. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 6(8), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v6i8.1110

Grace, E., Raghavendra, P., & Connell, T. (2014). Learning to use the Internet and online social media : What is the effectiveness of home-based intervention for youth with complex communication needs ? Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2014, 30(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659013518565

Guidance, I. J. E. V. (2014). Ethical issues associated with information and communication technology in counseling and guidance. Springer, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-013-9258-7

Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Dung, J. J., & Yang, Y. L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Educational Technology and Society, 10(2), 191–212.

Lewis, S., Pea, R., & Rosen, J. (2010). Beyond participation to co-creation of meaning : mobile social media in generative learning communities. Social Science Information, 49(3), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018410370726

Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers and Education, 60(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015

Lodico, M. . S. D. & V. K. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice, 2nd Edition. In The Canadian Journal of Action Research (Issue 3).

Meiliani, M., Tanti, T., & Sulman, F. (2021). Student Resources On Newton’s Lawa Concepts Reviewing From Gender: Identification Using Open-Ended Question. Indonesia Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 04(November), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i3.10177

Michalsky, T. (2020). Preservice teachers’ professional vision for and capacity to teach self-regulated learning: Effects of scaffolding level. Teachers College Record, 122(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200310

Mullet, D. R., Kettler, T., & Sabatini, A. M. (2018). Gifted Students’ Conceptions of Their High School STEM Education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217745156

Nada, A. Q., Taqwa, M., Arief, T., Supriana, E., & Suwasono, P. (2022). Development of an Android-Based Physics Interactive E-Module Equipped with Problems with Scaffolding in Applying the Concept of Light Waves. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 8–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.43

Njie, B., & Asimiran, S. (2014). Case Study as a Choice in Qualitative Methodology. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 4(3), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-04313540

Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., Steingut, R. R., Trimble, S. S., & Pituch, K. A. (2017). Supporting and Thwarting Autonomy in the High School Science Classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 35(4), 337–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1358722

Putra, M. I. J., Junaid, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). The Ability of the Question and Answer (Q&A) Method with the Help of Learning Videos against Student Learning Outcomes amid the Covid-19 Pandemic. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 2160–2169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.768

Rahim, F. R., Suherman, D. S., & Muttaqiin, A. (2020). Exploring the effectiveness of e-book for students on learning material: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1481(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012105

Rozal, E., Ananda, R., Zb, A., Fauziddin, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). The Effect of Project-Based Learning through YouTube Presentations on English Learning Outcomes in Physics. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1924–1933. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.1241

Sanchez, C. A., & Weber, K. (2019). Using Relevant Animations to Counter Stereotype Threat When Learning Science. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.08.003

Sari, T., & Nayır, F. (2020). Challenges in distance education during the (Covid-19) pandemic period. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(3), 328–360. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2020.5872

Sastradika, D., Iskandar, I., Syefrinando, B., & Shulman, F. (2021). Development of animation-based learning media to increase student’s motivation in learning physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012180

Singer, S. R., Nielsen, N. R., & Schweingruber, H. a. (2012). Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering.

Squire, K. (2012). Amplifications of learning : Use of mobile media devices among youth. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 18(4), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856511429646

Steel, B. S., Warner, R. L., & Lach, D. (2010). Gender differences in support for scientific involvement in U.S. environmental policy. Science Technology and Human Values, 35(2), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909340259

Sukiyasa, K., & Sukoco, S. (2013). Pengaruh media animasi terhadap hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar siswa materi sistem kelistrikan otomotif. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 3(1), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v3i1.1588

Sulman, F., Tanti, T., Habibi, M., & Zb, A. (2021). Pengaruh Media Animasi Berkarakter Islami Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pengetahuan Bumi dan Antariksa. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v5i1.1044

Sulman, F., Yuliati, L., Purnama, B. Y., & Arief, M. R. (2022). Creativity In Deriving The Fermi-Dirac Equation Through STEAM Approaches. 10(3). https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i3.13182

van Baalen, W. M., de Groot, T., & Noordegraaf-Eelens, L. (2021). Higher education, the arts, and transdisciplinarity: A systematic review of the literature. Research in Education, 003452372110057. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237211005799

Weaver, J. P., Chastain, R. J., DeCaro, D. A., & DeCaro, M. S. (2018). Reverse the routine: Problem solving before instruction improves conceptual knowledge in undergraduate physics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.12.003

Zb, A., Setiawan, M. E., Rozal, E., & Sulman, F. (2021). Investigating Hybrid Learning Strategies: Does it Affect Creativity? Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(4), 868–875. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i4.4063