The Effect of the STAD Type Cooperative Learning Model with the Help of Crossword Worksheet on Biology Learning Outcomes, especially the Cognitive Domain

Authors

  • Aminah Zb UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Rizki Ananda Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai
  • Bismark Mensah Univesity of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.31

Keywords:

Cognitive Domain, Cooperative Learning Model, Crossword Puzzle Worksheets, STAD

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the STAD-type cooperative model with the help of Crossword Puzzles on students' biology learning outcomes, especially on Development and Growth material in terms of Cognitive aspects. The population in this study amounted to 5 classes, and a sample of 2 classes was taken randomly. The study was conducted in two classes which were grouped as experimental class and control class. In the experimental class, learning is carried out using a STAD-type cooperative model with the help of crossword puzzle worksheets, while in the control class, learning is carried out using a conventional model research data obtained from the test of learning outcomes for cognitive aspects. Student learning outcomes on cognitive aspects were analyzed by t-test. The results of data analysis show that the learning outcomes of cognitive domain biology students whose learning uses the STAD-type cooperative model with the help of crossword puzzle worksheets are higher than students whose learning uses the conventional model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akman, O., Eaton, C. D., Hrozencik, D., Jenkins, K. P., & Thompson, K. V. (2020). Building Community-Based Approaches to Systemic Reform in Mathematical Biology Education. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 82(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-020-00781-4

Colorado, H. A., Mendoza, D. E., & Valencia, F. L. (2021). A Combined Strategy of Additive Manufacturing to Support Multidisciplinary Education in Arts, Biology, and Engineering. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09873-1

Cummings, S. I. (1974). A methodology for environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 6(2), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1974.10801853

Defrianti, D., & Iskandar, I. (2022). The Mastery of Teacher Emotional Intelligence Facing 21st Century Learning. International Journal of Educational and Teaching Zone, 1(1), 50–59.

Gray, P. (2011). The Evolutionary Biology of Education: How Our Hunter-Gatherer Educative Instincts Could Form the Basis for Education Today. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0306-1

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education. In STEM Integration in K-12 Education. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612

Mattu, J., & Sullivan, J. A. (2020). Classification, kinds, taxonomic stability and conceptual change. Aggression and Violent Behavior, May, 101477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101477

Reyza, M., Taqwa, A., Sulman, F., & Faizah, R. (2022). College Students ’ Conceptual Understanding of Force and Motion : Research Focus on Resource Theory College Students ’ Conceptual Understanding of Force and Motion : Research Focus on Resource Theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012073

Rice, J. W., Olson, J. K., & Colbert, J. T. (2011). University Evolution Education: The Effect of Evolution Instruction on Biology Majors’ Content Knowledge, Attitude Toward Evolution, and Theistic Position. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(1), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0289-y

Sulman, F., Sutopo, S., & Kusairi, S. (2021). FMCE-PHQ-9 Assessment with Rasch Model in Detecting Concept Understanding , Cheating , and Depression amid the Covid-19 Pandemic. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 6(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v6i2.9273

Sulman, F., Yuliati, L., Kusairi, S., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Hybrid Learning Model : Its Impact on Mastery of Concepts and Self-Regulation in Newton ’ s Second Law Material. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v5i1.273

Zb, A., Novalian, D., Ananda, R., Habibi, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). DISTANCE LEARNING WITH STEAM APPROACHES: Is Effect On The Cognitive Domain? 6(2), 129–140.

Zb, A., Novalian, D., Rozal, E., Sulman, F., & Habibi, M. (2021). STEM Approach in Online Lectures: How Does it Contribute to Cognitive Aspects? Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 5(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v5i2.4365

Zb, A., Setiawan, M. E., Rozal, E., & Sulman, F. (2021). Investigating Hybrid Learning Strategies: Does it Affect Creativity? Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(4), 868–875. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i4.4063

Zb, A., Setiawan, M. E., & Sulman, F. (2020). Pengaruh E-Learning Berbasis Schoology Berbantuan WhatsApp Group terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19. Al-Khidmah, 3(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.29406/al-khidmah.v3i2.2282

Zubaidah, S. (2018). Disampaikan pada Kuliah Tamu di Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Islam Riau, 28 April 2018 1. April, 1–8.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-08

How to Cite

Zb, A., Ananda, R., & Mensah, B. . (2022). The Effect of the STAD Type Cooperative Learning Model with the Help of Crossword Worksheet on Biology Learning Outcomes, especially the Cognitive Domain. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.31