Problem-Based Learning Through Outdoor Learning or Conventional Learning: How is it Different for Science Subjects?

Nanang Nofriadi; Yeti  kurnia

doi:10.57092/ijetz.v3i3.315

Authors

Nanang Nofriadi UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
Yeti Kurnia UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v3i3.315

Keywords:

Junior High School, Outdoor Learning, Problem-Based Learning, Science Subjects

Abstract

The research carried out aims to see how the problem-based learning model with outdoor study influences students' science learning outcomes compared to conventional learning models. The population of this research was 98 students of SMPN 12 Tanjung Jabung Timur, while the sample was 26 students of class VII A and 25 students of class VII B, taken using a purposive sampling technique where class VII A was the experimental class and class VI B as a control class. This research is quantitative research using a quasi-experimental method with non-equivalent control group design. The data collection technique used in this research was a multiple choice test and analyzed using the t-test to see differences in learning outcomes with two different learning models. Based on the results of tests carried out with 20 multiple choice questions, researchers found that there were striking differences in learning outcomes where the average posttest score for experimental class students was 60 while the control class was 39.8, which was then analyzed through paired difference tests (t-test) for looked at the differences and obtained results of 0.000 < 0.05, which means Ha was accepted and H0 was rejected, which can be concluded that there are differences in student learning outcomes who use the problem-based learning model with outdoor study compared to the control class which in this case uses the conventional model. The findings obtained can strengthen evidence that the influence caused by the use of a problem-based learning model with outdoor study on the science learning outcomes of high school students is very good.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, A. (2013). Effects of self-efficacy on students’ academic performance. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 2(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v2i1.3740

Ardianti, R., Sujarwanto, E., & Surahman, E. (2021). Problem based learning: What and how. Diffraction: Journal for Physics Education and Applied Physics, 3(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.37058/diffraction.v3i1.4416

Dewi, K. T. (2021). Pengaruh pembelajaran luar kelas (outdoor learning) berbentuk jelajah lingkungan dan motivasi terhadap hasil belajar biologi siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Gianyar. Wahana Matematika dan Sains: Jurnal Matematika, Sains, dan Pembelajarannya, 15(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.23887/wms.v15i1.31695

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education, Inc.

Daryanes, F., Darmadi, D., Fikri, K., & Sayuti, I. (2023). The development of articulate storyline interactive learning media based on case methods to train student ’ s problem-solving ability. Heliyon, 9(4), e15082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15082

Eleknaviciute, V., Lehtinen, E., & Sodervik, I. (2023). Thirty years of conceptual change research in biology – A review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. Education Reaserch Review, 41(August 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100556

Ermawati, T. U., & Arisona, R. D. (2021). The influence of outdoor study learning methods in the form of field work on economic activity material on integrated social sciences learning outcomes for middle school students. JIIPSI: Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.21154/jiipsi.v1i1.41

Faadhilah, N. A., & Indayati, T. (2023). Analysis of teacher perspectives on the implementation of the Independent curriculum. Mappesona Journal, 6(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.30863/mappesona.v6i1.3819

Flórez, M. T., & Sammons, P. (2023). Assessment for learning : effects and impact. CfBT Education Trust. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED546817

Giesen, L., & Roeser, A. (2020). Structuring a team based approach to coding qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920968700

Gray, P. (2011). The evolutionary biology of education: How our hunter-gatherer educative instincts could form the basis for education today. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0306-1

Husamah. (2013). Outdoor learning. Jakarta: Pustaka Raya Achievement.

Iancu, M. (2014). Socio-cognitive conflict in learning biology-challenge , solving and roles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.214

Januchta, M. M. K., Schönborn, K. J., Roehrig, C., Chaudhri, V. K., Tibell, L. A. E., & Heller, H. C. (2022). Connecting concepts helps put main ideas together: cognitive load and usability in learning biology with an AI ‑ enriched textbook. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00317-3

Johnston, J. S. (2014). John Dewey and science education. In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_75

Koseoglu, S., & Doering, A. (2011). Understanding complex ecologies: An investigation of student experiences in adventure learning programs. Distance Education, 32(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610292

Laprise, R. (2018). What’s the problem? Exploring the potential of problem based learning in an ensemble setting teachers. Music Educators Journal, 104(4), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432118754636

Li, Z., & Yu, C. (2022). The control, systems and stability course of 8 lectures in middle and high school's biology curriculum: Design and Practice. IFAC Papers OnLine, 55(17), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.227

Makkonen, T., Tirri, K., & Lavonen, J. (2021). Engagement in learning physics through project-based learning: A case study of gifted finnish upper-secondary-level students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 501–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211018644

Maulidiyahwarti, G., Sumarmi, & Amirudin, A. (2016). The influence of the outdoor study based problem based learning model on the learning outcomes of class XI IIS SMA students. Journal of Education, 1(2), 94–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i2.6101

Melati, H. (2017). The influence of the problem based learning model based on outdoor study with ecosystem themes on students' mastery of concepts and interpersonal intelligence. Thesis. http://lib.unnes.ac.id/32052/

Mujib, A. S., Mustolikh, & Bramasta, D. (2023). The influence of the outdoor study based problem based learning model on student learning outcomes in geography subjects at SMA NEGERI 1 Patimuan, Cilacap Regency. EduCurio, 1(2), 420 425. https://qjurnal.my.id/index.php/educurio/article/view/271

Moallem, M., Hung, W., & Nada, D. (2019). The Wiley Handbook of Problem‐Based Learning. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All.

Nofriadi, N., & Yestin, Y. (2022). Investigating the everyone Is teacher here (ETH) learning model on biology learning outcomes. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 8–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.45

Pamuji, Z., & Mawardi, K. (2023). Islamic religious education curriculum development based on multiculturalism in merdeka curriculum at elementary school. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(2), 286–298. https://doi.org/https://10.57092/ijetz.v2i2.125

Paradina, D., Connie, C., & Medriati, R. (2019). The influence of the problem based learning model on student learning outcomes in class X. Journal of Physics Kumparan, 2(3), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.2.3.169-176

Parija, Subhash Chandra; Kate, V. (2018). Writing the Review of Literature in a Thesis. In Thesis Writing for Master’s and Ph.D. Program. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0890-1_14

Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., Steingut, R. R., Trimble, S. S., & Pituch, K. A. (2017). Supporting and thwarting autonomy in the high school science classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 35(4), 337–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1358722

Puspitasari, W., Anhar, A., Zulyusri, Z., & Ristiono, R. (2020). Analysis of spiritual and social attitudes in the science-biology learning process of students class VIII of SMPN 20 Padang. BIO-EDU: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(April), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32938/jbe.v5i1.466

Putri, M. H., Hendri, W., Har, E., & Gusmaweti, G. (2022). Analysis of study habits and their relationship with biology learning outcomes of class XI MIPA students at SMA N 8 Padang. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 8–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.47

Rahmawati, D. (2018). Analysis of problem solving skill in learning biology at senior high school of Surakarta Analysis of problem solving skill in learning biology at senior high school of Surakarta. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012014

Rusli, A., Hendri, W., & Sari, R. T. (2023). Relationship of external factor caused students’ learning difficulties and biology leaning outcome in class XI IPA MAN 3 Padang City. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i1.57

Sawant, A. P., Patil, S. A., Vijapurkar, J., & Bagban, N. N. (2018). Correction to : Is the undergraduate microbiology curriculum preparing students for careers in their field ? : An assessment of biology majors ’ conceptions of growth and control of microorganisms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(42), 4–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0138-z

Scholz, R. W., Flückiger, B., Schwarzenbach, R. C., Stauffacher, M., Mieg, H., & Neuenschwander, M. (1997). Environmental problem solving ability: Profiles in application documents of research assistants. The Journal of Environmental Education, 28(4), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1997.9942834

Sezen, G., & B, A. C. (2012). Designing computer assisted problem based learning environment in the subject of endocrine system in human beings for high school biology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.655

Sofyan, H., Wagiran, Komariah, K., & Triwiyono, E. (2017). Problem based learning in the 2013 Curriculum. News. Ge. Yogyakarta: UNY

Sripathi, K. N., Moscarella, R. A., Steele, M., Yoho, R., You, H., & Prevost, L. B. (2024). Machine learning mixed methods text analysis : An Illustration from automated scoring models of student writing in biology education. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231153946

Sugiyono, S. (2019). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R & D Research Methods. Bandung: Alphabeta

Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, O. (2006). Improving achievement through problem-based learning. Journal of Biological Education, 40(4), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656037

Trueman, R. J. (2014). Productive failure in STEM education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 42(3), 199–214. https://doi.org//10.2190/ET.42.3.b

Usmansyah, F. A., Khaeruddin, & Amal, A. (2023). The Influence of outdoor study on elementary school students' science learning outcomes. JUDIKNAS: Indonesian Journal of Basic Education, 2(3), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v2i2.835