The Analysis of Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability and Mathematical Creativity: Judging from the Process of Deriving the Fermi-Dirac Formula
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.33Keywords:
Ferimi-Dirac Equation, Mathematical Creative Thinking, Mathematical Critical Thinking, Statistical PhysicsAbstract
This study aims to see and simultaneously describe the ability to think critically and creatively in student physics teacher candidates in the Fermi-Dirac course. Descriptive quantitative was used as the method of this research. Data collection in the study used tests on the cognitive domain in the form of a description of 8 questions where four measured critical thinking skills and four questions measured creative thinking skills. The data analysis process was carried out qualitatively and then described to determine the students' mathematical critical thinking and creative thinking skills, which were then assessed in distribution based on the categories that had been created. The data and facts that the researchers found after the study showed that the average mathematical thinking ability of students was in the Good Enough category, and the average mathematical communication ability of students were also in the Good Enough category.
Downloads
References
Baki, A., Çatlioǧlu, H., Coştu, S., & Birgin, O. (2009). Conceptions of high school students about mathematical connections to the real-life. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1402–1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.247
Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00229
Creswell, J. W. (2003). RESEARCH DESIGN QUANTITATIVE, QUALITATIVE, AND MIXED METHODS, APRROACHES SECCOND EDITION (p. 246).
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.
Defrianti, D., & Iskandar, I. (2022). The Mastery of Teacher Emotional Intelligence Facing 21st Century Learning. International Journal of Educationa and Teaching Zone, 1(1), 50–59.
Hadar, L. L., & Tirosh, M. (2019). Creative thinking in mathematics curriculum: An analytic framework. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100585
Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019).
Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35(September 2019), 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
Legesse, M., Luneta, K., & Ejigu, T. (2020). Analyzing the effects of mathematical discourse-based instruction on eleventh-grade students’ procedural and conceptual understanding of probability and statistics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100918
Lin, T. J., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Identifying Taiwanese University students’ physics learning profiles and their role in physics learning self-efficacy. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9440-z
Meiliani, M., Tanti, T., & Sulman, F. (2021). Student Resources On Newton’s Lawa Concepts Reviewing From Gender: Identification Using Open-Ended Question. Indonesia Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 04(November), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i3.10177
Ningsih, F. N. (2022). Analysis of Students ’ Concession Understanding Ability in Solving Physics Concepts. International Journal of Educationa and Teaching Zone, 1(1), 25–33.
Putra, M. I. J., Junaid, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). The Ability of the Question and Answer (Q&A) Method with the Help of Learning Videos against Student Learning Outcomes amid the Covid-19 Pandemic. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 2160–2169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.768
Reyza, M., Taqwa, A., Sulman, F., & Faizah, R. (2022). College Students ’ Conceptual Understanding of Force and Motion : Research Focus on Resource Theory College Students ’ Conceptual Understanding of Force and Motion : Research Focus on Resource Theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012073
Rozal, E., Ananda, R., Zb, A., Fauziddin, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). The Effect of Project-Based Learning through YouTube Presentations on English Learning Outcomes in Physics. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1924–1933. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.1241
Sari, E. R., Lestari, E., & Ananda, R. (2022). Implementation of Blended Learning for Class IX Science Learning after the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Educationa and Teaching Zone, 1(1), 44–49.
Shaw, R. D. (2014). How Critical Is Critical Thinking? Music Educators Journal, 101(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432114544376
Sri Hastuti, I. M. (2021). Model Asesmen Alternatif Dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran di Era Pandemi Covid-19. Tadarus Tarbawy, 3(1), 280–290.
Sulman, F. (2012). Pengaruh Model Kooperatif Tipe Problem Possing dan Motivasi Awal Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 12 Padang.
Sulman, F. (2019). Application of Cooperative Problem Posing and Prior Motivation Towards Students Learning Outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research (IJER), 4(2), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.30631/ijer.v4i2.126
Sulman, F., Sutopo, S., & Kusairi, S. (2021). FMCE-PHQ-9 Assessment with Rasch Model in Detecting Concept Understanding , Cheating , and Depression amid the Covid-19 Pandemic. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 6(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v6i2.9273
Sulman, F., Tanti, T., Habibi, M., & Zb, A. (2021). Pengaruh Media Animasi Berkarakter Islami Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pengetahuan Bumi dan Antariksa. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v5i1.1044
Sulman, F., Taqwa, M. R. A., Aminah Zb, A. Z., Rafzan, R., & Fikri, A. (2020). The Effect of Mathematical Connections on the Mastery of Probability Material. Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v3i2.645
Sulman, F., Yuliati, L., Kusairi, S., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Hybrid Learning Model : Its Impact on Mastery of Concepts and Self- Regulation in Newton ’ s Second Law Material. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v5i1.273
Tuan Soh, T. M., Arsada, N. M., & Osman, K. (2010). The relationship of 21st century skills on students’ attitude and perception towards physics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.073
Zandvakili, E., Washington, E., Gordon, E. W., Wells, C., & Mangaliso, M. (2019). Teaching Patterns of Critical Thinking: The 3CA Model—Concept Maps, Critical Thinking, Collaboration, and Assessment. SAGE Open, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019885142
Zb, A., Novalian, D., Ananda, R., Habibi, M., & Sulman, F. (2021). DISTANCE LEARNING WITH STEAM APPROACHES: Is Effect On The Cognitive Domain? 6(2), 129–140.
Zb, A., Novalian, D., Rozal, E., Sulman, F., & Habibi, M. (2021). STEM Approach in Online Lectures: How Does it Contribute to Cognitive Aspects? Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 5(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v5i2.4365
Zb, A., Setiawan, M. E., Rozal, E., & Sulman, F. (2021). Investigating Hybrid Learning Strategies: Does it Affect Creativity? Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(4), 868–875. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i4.4063
Zb, A., Setiawan, M. E., & Sulman, F. (2020). Pengaruh E-Learning Berbasis Schoology Berbantuan WhatsApp Group terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19. Al-Khidmah, 3(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.29406/al-khidmah.v3i2.2282
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The (Author)s

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
























