Elementary Teachers’ Acceptance of Digital Learning Platforms for Differentiated and Deep Learning: An Empirical Study Based on the UTAUT Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v5i1.610Keywords:
Technology acceptance, UTAUT, Teacher professional development, Differentiated instruction, Digital learning mediaAbstract
The effective integration of digital technology in differentiated and deep learning requires a clear understanding of the factors influencing teachers’ acceptance of instructional platforms. This study investigates the determinants of elementary school teachers’ adoption of Canva for developing differentiated learning media using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework. A quantitative design was employed, involving 133 Indonesian elementary teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through a validated questionnaire and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS 4, including measurement and structural model evaluation based on path coefficients, p-values, R², and predictive relevance (Q²). The model explains 68% of the variance in behavioral intention (R² = 0.68), indicating substantial explanatory power. The results show that effort expectancy (β = 0.35, p < 0.01), social influence (β = 0.28, p < 0.01), and self-efficacy (β = 0.22, p < 0.05) significantly and positively influence teachers’ intention to use Canva, whereas performance expectancy and facilitating conditions do not exhibit significant direct effects. These findings confirm the relevance of UTAUT in the Indonesian educational technology context and identify ease of use, social support, and digital confidence as key drivers of technology adoption. The study offers practical implications for professional development programs and educational policy aimed at strengthening technology integration for differentiated instruction.
Downloads
References
Afthanorhan, A., Ghazali, P. L., & Rashid, N. (2021). Discriminant validity: A comparison of CBSEM and consistent PLS using Fornell & Larcker and HTMT approaches. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1874(1), 012085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012085
Ajani, O. A. (2025). Enablers, Barriers, and Pedagogical Strategies in Diverse Learning Environments. In Enablers, Barriers, and Challenges for Inclusive Curriculum (pp. 1–24). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Williams, M. D. (2017). Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1177–1190. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585316301950
Albeta, S. W., Firdaus, L. N., Copriady, J., & Alimin, M. (2023). TPACK-based blended learning as an implementation of progressivism education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i1.51287
Alharbi, A. (2021). Relevance of local context in teaching science: Enhancing student understanding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(4), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09919-8
Ali, H., Hamdan, H., & Mahaputra, M. R. (2022). Faktor Eksternal Perceived Ease of Use dan Perceived Usefulness pada Aplikasi Belanja Online: Adopsi Technology Accepted Model. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin, 1(3), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v1i3
Anggraeni, I. (2022). Enhancing Character Education through Digital Tools: The Role of Technology in Primary Education. Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1234/jedutech.v5n1.56789
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, *84*(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Cahya, A. I., Kurniawan, D. T., & Abidin, Y. (2025). Integrating STEM and Global Citizenship in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Study of Student Character Values in Elementary Schools. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Pendidikan, 34(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.17977/um009v34i12025p172-187
Chao, C.-M. (2019). Factors determining behavioral intention to use mobile learning. Computers & Education, 128, 1–13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652/full?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Chen, C. H., & Huang, T. H. (2022). An Investigation of Innovative Teaching Methods for Enhancing Student Engagement in Primary School. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10056-7
Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Lau, R. S. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pac J Manag, 41, 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darliana, T. (2022). Implementing Human Values in Elementary School Curriculum: Challenges and Strategies. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology, 13(2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijcet.v13n2.09876
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling
and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Fayolle, A., Jaafar, N., & Ayupp, K. (2017). Impact of service quality on e-learning system use. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(2), 110–131. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ITSE-02-2017-0019
Ferreira, J. M., Acuña, S. T., Dieste, O., Vegas, S., Santos, A., Rodríguez, F., & Juristo, N. (2020). Impact of usability mechanisms: An experiment on efficiency, effectiveness and user satisfaction. Information and Software Technology, 117, 106195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2019.106195
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer.
Hariyanto, D., Triyono, M. B., & Köhler, T. (2020). Usability evaluationof personalized adaptive e-learning system using. USE Questionnaire.Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 12(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2020.12.005
Hilkenmeier, F., Bohndick, C., Bohndick, T., & Hilkenmeier, J. (2020). Assessing distinctiveness in multidimensional instruments without access to raw data–a manifest Fornell-Larcker criterion. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00223
Ibrahim, A., & Shiring, E. (2022). The Relationship between Educators’ Attitudes, Perceived Usefulness, and Perceived Ease of Use of Instructional and Web-Based Technologies: Implications from Technology Acceptance Model (TAM. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(4), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.285
Izah, S. C., Sylva, L., & Hait, M. (2023). Cronbach’s alpha: A cornerstone in ensuring reliability and validity in environmental health assessment. ES Energy & Environment, 23. https://doi.org/10.30919/esee1057
Kebudayaan, K. P. (2021). Kurikulum Merdeka: Pedoman untuk Sekolah Dasar. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://kurikulum.kemendikdasmen.go.id/file/1711503412_manage_file.pdf
Khechine, H., Raymond, B., & Augier, M. (2016). The adoption of a social learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 569–579.
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. https://www.guilford.com/books
Mastour, H., Yousefi, R., & Niroumand, S. (2025). Exploring the acceptance of e-learning in health professions education in Iran based on the technology acceptance model (TAM. Sci Rep, 15, 8178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90742-5
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mohd Ashril, N. A. N., Chee, K. N., Yahaya, N., & Abdul Razak, R. (2024). Barriers, Strategies and Accessibility: Enhancing Engagement and Retention of Learners with Disabilities in MOOCs–A Systematic Literature Review (SLR. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2414892
Olasina, G. (2019). Human and social factors affecting e-learning adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 343–353. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563219304198
Owolabi, H. O., Ayandele, J. K., & Olaoye, D. D. (2020). A systematic review of structural equation model (SEM. Open Journal of Educational Development, 1(2), 27–39. https://www.openjournalsnigeria.org.ng/journals/index.php/ojed/article/view/163
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Adoption of online public grievance redressal system in India: Toward a unified view. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 1–12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563217303047
Raffaghelli, J. E., Rodríguez, M. E., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Bañeres, D. (2022). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of an early warning system in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 182, 104468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104468
Rouidi, M., Hamdoune, A., Choujtani, K., & Chati, A. (2022). TAM-UTAUT and the acceptance of remote healthcare technologies by healthcare professionals: A systematic review. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2022.101008
Santos, J., Figueiredo, A. S., & Vieira, M. (2019). Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 72, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model revisited. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519300281
Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563211002717
Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). A systematic review of UTAUT2. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(4), 987–1006. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10796-021-10124-6
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). The effects of individual differences on e-learning users’ behavior in developing countries: A structural equation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 223–234. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563214002166
Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131511000914
Thomas, T. D., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(3), 71–85. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1071379.pdf
Thongwichit, N., & Ulla, M. B. (2024). Translanguaging Pedagogy in Thailand’s English Medium of Instruction Classrooms: Teachers’ Perspectives and Practices. TESL-EJ. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1417868
Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
Taiwo, A. A., & Downe, A. G. (2013). The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A meta-analytic review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 49(1), 48–58. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2665784
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720612000693
Venkatesh, V. (2022). Adoption and use of AI tools: A research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9
Vetrivel, S. C., Arun, V. P., Maheswari, R., & Saravanan, T. P. (2024). Technology integration in online learning platforms: Blended learning gamification. In Transdisciplinary Teaching and Technological Integration for Improved Learning: Case Studies and Practical Approaches (pp. 219–247). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8217-2
Wang, T., Olivier, D. F., & Chen, P. (2023). Creating individual and organizational readiness for change: Conceptualization of system readiness for change in school education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(6), 1037–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1818131
Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443–488. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEIM-01-2015-0005
Yetti, E. (2024). Pedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100233
Yusra, K., & Lestari, Y. B. (2018). Integrating attitude, knowledge and skills in K-13 English lesson plans: Explorations into teachers. Agentic Roles in Materials Development, 20(3), 176–194. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:726925
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Iis Hartati, Yunus Abidin, Dede Trie Kurniawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
























