Elementary Teachers’ Acceptance of Digital Learning Platforms for Differentiated and Deep Learning: An Empirical Study Based on the UTAUT Framework

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v5i1.610

Keywords:

Technology acceptance, UTAUT, Teacher professional development, Differentiated instruction, Digital learning media

Abstract

The effective integration of digital technology in differentiated and deep learning requires a clear understanding of the factors influencing teachers’ acceptance of instructional platforms. This study investigates the determinants of elementary school teachers’ adoption of Canva for developing differentiated learning media using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework. A quantitative design was employed, involving 133 Indonesian elementary teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through a validated questionnaire and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS 4, including measurement and structural model evaluation based on path coefficients, p-values, R², and predictive relevance (Q²). The model explains 68% of the variance in behavioral intention (R² = 0.68), indicating substantial explanatory power. The results show that effort expectancy (β = 0.35, p < 0.01), social influence (β = 0.28, p < 0.01), and self-efficacy (β = 0.22, p < 0.05) significantly and positively influence teachers’ intention to use Canva, whereas performance expectancy and facilitating conditions do not exhibit significant direct effects. These findings confirm the relevance of UTAUT in the Indonesian educational technology context and identify ease of use, social support, and digital confidence as key drivers of technology adoption. The study offers practical implications for professional development programs and educational policy aimed at strengthening technology integration for differentiated instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adham, T. K. I. (2023). Conflict resolution in team: Analyzing the of conflicts and best skills for resolution. Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology, 11(08), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjet.2023.v11i08.001

Afthanorhan, A., Ghazali, P. L., & Rashid, N. (2021). Discriminant validity: A comparison of CBSEM and consistent PLS using Fornell & Larcker and HTMT approaches. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1874(1), 012085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012085

Ajani, O. A. (2025). Enablers, Barriers, and Pedagogical Strategies in Diverse Learning Environments. In Enablers, Barriers, and Challenges for Inclusive Curriculum (pp. 1–24). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Williams, M. D. (2017). Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1177–1190. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585316301950

Albeta, S. W., Firdaus, L. N., Copriady, J., & Alimin, M. (2023). TPACK-based blended learning as an implementation of progressivism education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i1.51287

Alharbi, A. (2021). Relevance of local context in teaching science: Enhancing student understanding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(4), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09919-8

Ali, H., Hamdan, H., & Mahaputra, M. R. (2022). Faktor Eksternal Perceived Ease of Use dan Perceived Usefulness pada Aplikasi Belanja Online: Adopsi Technology Accepted Model. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin, 1(3), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v1i3

Anggraeni, I. (2022). Enhancing Character Education through Digital Tools: The Role of Technology in Primary Education. Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1234/jedutech.v5n1.56789

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, *84*(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Cahya, A. I., Kurniawan, D. T., & Abidin, Y. (2025). Integrating STEM and Global Citizenship in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Study of Student Character Values in Elementary Schools. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Pendidikan, 34(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.17977/um009v34i12025p172-187

Chao, C.-M. (2019). Factors determining behavioral intention to use mobile learning. Computers & Education, 128, 1–13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652/full?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Chen, C. H., & Huang, T. H. (2022). An Investigation of Innovative Teaching Methods for Enhancing Student Engagement in Primary School. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10056-7

Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Lau, R. S. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pac J Manag, 41, 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darliana, T. (2022). Implementing Human Values in Elementary School Curriculum: Challenges and Strategies. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology, 13(2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijcet.v13n2.09876

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling

and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Fayolle, A., Jaafar, N., & Ayupp, K. (2017). Impact of service quality on e-learning system use. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(2), 110–131. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ITSE-02-2017-0019

Ferreira, J. M., Acuña, S. T., Dieste, O., Vegas, S., Santos, A., Rodríguez, F., & Juristo, N. (2020). Impact of usability mechanisms: An experiment on efficiency, effectiveness and user satisfaction. Information and Software Technology, 117, 106195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2019.106195

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer.

Hariyanto, D., Triyono, M. B., & Köhler, T. (2020). Usability evaluationof personalized adaptive e-learning system using. USE Questionnaire.Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 12(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2020.12.005

Hilkenmeier, F., Bohndick, C., Bohndick, T., & Hilkenmeier, J. (2020). Assessing distinctiveness in multidimensional instruments without access to raw data–a manifest Fornell-Larcker criterion. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00223

Ibrahim, A., & Shiring, E. (2022). The Relationship between Educators’ Attitudes, Perceived Usefulness, and Perceived Ease of Use of Instructional and Web-Based Technologies: Implications from Technology Acceptance Model (TAM. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(4), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.285

Izah, S. C., Sylva, L., & Hait, M. (2023). Cronbach’s alpha: A cornerstone in ensuring reliability and validity in environmental health assessment. ES Energy & Environment, 23. https://doi.org/10.30919/esee1057

Kebudayaan, K. P. (2021). Kurikulum Merdeka: Pedoman untuk Sekolah Dasar. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://kurikulum.kemendikdasmen.go.id/file/1711503412_manage_file.pdf

Khechine, H., Raymond, B., & Augier, M. (2016). The adoption of a social learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 569–579.

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. https://www.guilford.com/books

Mastour, H., Yousefi, R., & Niroumand, S. (2025). Exploring the acceptance of e-learning in health professions education in Iran based on the technology acceptance model (TAM. Sci Rep, 15, 8178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90742-5

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mohd Ashril, N. A. N., Chee, K. N., Yahaya, N., & Abdul Razak, R. (2024). Barriers, Strategies and Accessibility: Enhancing Engagement and Retention of Learners with Disabilities in MOOCs–A Systematic Literature Review (SLR. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2414892

Olasina, G. (2019). Human and social factors affecting e-learning adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 343–353. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563219304198

Owolabi, H. O., Ayandele, J. K., & Olaoye, D. D. (2020). A systematic review of structural equation model (SEM. Open Journal of Educational Development, 1(2), 27–39. https://www.openjournalsnigeria.org.ng/journals/index.php/ojed/article/view/163

Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Adoption of online public grievance redressal system in India: Toward a unified view. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 1–12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563217303047

Raffaghelli, J. E., Rodríguez, M. E., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Bañeres, D. (2022). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of an early warning system in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 182, 104468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104468

Rouidi, M., Hamdoune, A., Choujtani, K., & Chati, A. (2022). TAM-UTAUT and the acceptance of remote healthcare technologies by healthcare professionals: A systematic review. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2022.101008

Santos, J., Figueiredo, A. S., & Vieira, M. (2019). Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 72, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model revisited. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519300281

Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563211002717

Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). A systematic review of UTAUT2. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(4), 987–1006. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10796-021-10124-6

Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). The effects of individual differences on e-learning users’ behavior in developing countries: A structural equation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 223–234. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563214002166

Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131511000914

Thomas, T. D., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(3), 71–85. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1071379.pdf

Thongwichit, N., & Ulla, M. B. (2024). Translanguaging Pedagogy in Thailand’s English Medium of Instruction Classrooms: Teachers’ Perspectives and Practices. TESL-EJ. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1417868

Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Taiwo, A. A., & Downe, A. G. (2013). The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A meta-analytic review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 49(1), 48–58. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2665784

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720612000693

Venkatesh, V. (2022). Adoption and use of AI tools: A research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9

Vetrivel, S. C., Arun, V. P., Maheswari, R., & Saravanan, T. P. (2024). Technology integration in online learning platforms: Blended learning gamification. In Transdisciplinary Teaching and Technological Integration for Improved Learning: Case Studies and Practical Approaches (pp. 219–247). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8217-2

Wang, T., Olivier, D. F., & Chen, P. (2023). Creating individual and organizational readiness for change: Conceptualization of system readiness for change in school education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(6), 1037–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1818131

Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443–488. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEIM-01-2015-0005

Yetti, E. (2024). Pedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100233

Yusra, K., & Lestari, Y. B. (2018). Integrating attitude, knowledge and skills in K-13 English lesson plans: Explorations into teachers. Agentic Roles in Materials Development, 20(3), 176–194. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:726925

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Iis Hartati, Yunus Abidin, & Dede Trie Kurniawan. (2026). Elementary Teachers’ Acceptance of Digital Learning Platforms for Differentiated and Deep Learning: An Empirical Study Based on the UTAUT Framework. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 5(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v5i1.610